Soundtracs Topaz 14 4 Manual Download

Rupam songs download. Presenting Benche Thakar Gaan from Autograph starring Prosenjit Chatterjee, Indranein Sengupta, Nandana Sen. This song has been composed by Anupam Roy and sung by Rupam Islam.

Here's a cool little mixer I picked up to submix drum machines, samplers, synths and so on in my home studio. It works great and sounds very even and warm. The EQ points seem to be just in the right places to sweeten up sounds without making them sound thin, muddy or harsh on the high end. Anyway, I'm not really doing much of that anymore, so I'm going to let it go. I'm mostly back to playing plain old acoustic drums again. This mixer would also be good for someone who was performing live and wanted to step up from a powered mixer setup to something a little bit more versatile. With the two aux's you could have a dedicated monitor mix and send a signal to your preferred effects processor.

Results 1 - 48 of 48 - Soundtracs Megas Mix 14-4-2 Mixing Desk Jade Solitaire Quartz InLine PC-Midi. Manuals can be downloaded from Behringer website.

All in all, this mixer, even though it's a smaller format one, seems more PRO than some of the newer stuff that's out there. The soft case and power supply are included. Here's a review of the mixer: /sos/1997_articles/mar97/soundtracstopaz.html Here's a yahoo group for topaz owners/users, as well: tech./group/soundtracstopaz/ Please let me know if you have questions. If international shipping is required, please contact me for a quote. Guaranteed not DOA, but that's it.

Thanks for looking.

Just doing my bit to get this thread into a three figure page count As someone who has, and does use Behringer gear, I think it's fair to say that they have come up with some good products. The DDX3216 is a joy of intuitive software/ui design. I loved using mine. However they have blatantly ripped off designs from other companies. They have been taken to court for it, and they have lost. But they continued to do this - taking the bet that a lot of relatively small companies can't afford to risk going to court, which is expensive.

I think when Behringer ripped of the Mackie 8 bus, 'designing' the Eurodesk MX8000, Mackie were doing pretty badly, so B took a risk and ripped them off. Still that's life in the corporate world.

They're always taking each other to court for stealing intellectual property etc. What annoys me more about Behringer gear is just how badly a lot of it is put together. Cheap components that don't last, sometimes components are completely missed by the flow soldering, big desks are not rigid enough and flex causing everything to break. I loved working with my DDX3216, and in the digital domain it sounded great.

Sadly the analogue bits were rubbish, and deteriorated badly after a couple of years (cheap capacitors). More significantly, after it had broken once, I was never confident that it was going to carry on working and be reliable. It's really annoying because I'd gladly pay more for a good quality DDX3216 because I think it's by far the most user friendly compact digital mixer. I now have a Tascam and it's terrible.

Sounds great, but truly baffling to operate. Some of their gear is very usable and good value. But a lot of it isn't good value, it's false economy. It's important to know the difference.

It isn't just Behringer gear that's cheap, big name brands are making good kit at the budget end. Given the choice of a £300 Behringer desk, or a £500 soundcraft desk, the quality difference is far great than the £200 would suggest and I would argue that often it's worth it. Poster Posts: 14 Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 1:00 am. Tomas wrote: I was impressed by the circuit design of the. Pure genius in simplicity and flexibility. The block diagram is in the spec sheet on B's web site. Then I came across Apparently a design from 1983 (according to the engineering note that carries an unbelivably similar block diagram).

Yes, but I've got a pair of the Rane boxes that I got off ebay for less than half the price I'd pay for a new B splitter/mixer, and, considering the build quality of the Rane gear (which is always built like a tank) in comparison to the build quality of ANYTHING I've seen that B make, I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts those Rane boxes will be functioning beautifully LONG after the B box has been thrown in the trash. I've got a bunch of old Rane gear that works beautifully, and I've also got a few that need fixing (a couple of bad pots is about the extent of it), and the Rane gear is easy to fix (and get parts for), and perhaps less expensive to fix as well.