Chertezhi Linkora Yamato

Going by the detonator/fuse from that leak, it seems like they're basically avoiding the same issues Roma has; high velocity but also high overpens. So high velocity short-fuse, which would mainly affect what's likely the T8~T10 guns and allow them to nuke cruisers and even some DDs despite the high shell velocity. This likely means though that the Italian BB line will be have overpen issues as an innate counterbalance to their own high velocity gunnery. We wouldn't want out glorious soviet BBs to have to suffer trade-offs in gun performance, we can just lump that on the Italians instead. I really do hope with get AP & SAP options for RM BBs, and not AP & crap HE.

Yamatai-koku (邪馬台国) or Yamato-koku (邪馬臺国) (c. 1st century – c. 3rd century) is the Sino-Japanese name of an ancient country in Wa (Japan) during the late Yayoi period (c.

Probably another possible Premium. Anyway, for those who don't recall, here are the datamined guns from a: Going by the detonator/fuse from that leak, it seems like they're basically avoiding the same issues Roma has; high velocity but also high overpens. So high velocity short-fuse, which would mainly affect what's likely the T8~T10 guns and allow them to nuke cruisers and even some DDs despite the high shell velocity. This likely means though that the Italian BB line will be have overpen issues as an innate counterbalance to their own high velocity gunnery.

The 1914 406mm shells look comparable to the USN/IJN equivalents, so it would end up being regular guns with short fuse. Assuming the T7 uses that gun, it would be balanced against having 9 of them and 6 guns forward vs the 8 guns/4 fore/aft setup of the nearest rivals, in Colorado and Nagato. On the other hand, it means better consistency vs cruisers and DDs within the spread. Who said we couldn't have missiles in game, lol. Well, it's not a great surprise given the datamined gun stats from a long while back, and it is new content.

A few of these do look quite funky and might end up being pretty enjoyable. Battlefield 4 complete edition repack by corepack 0. The T8 Nelsonski with 32mm plating, that turret arrangement and the presumable excellent ballistics of a Russian ship will be. Is the CB-4 a knock-off Littorio? It's not exactly what I'd have chosen, but I'll play it. My resistance to paper is dropping, sure there's only one commissioned ship here, but the French only had two in their BB lineup. I think it may have been concurrent?

Check out xero snake's thread. The T7 is looking a little too potent; assuming it had the 16' with similar performance to the Colorado/Nagato from the datamined guns. It should have been left with the non-superfiring AB turrets, giving her a +1 gun advantage and better angled fire (6 vs 4) at the expense of not being able to bring both triples to bear to the front. But we'll see how they handle her. Assuming they give Pr.24 her full armoring, she'd be capable of face-tanking everything (even Yamato's 460s) and laugh it off. It's only when attacking her from the sides and rear that she'd likely collapse as fast as Yamato.

Given the overall design of the ships; I'm assuming the gimmicks are high durability/armor and high HP, but sluggish handling. As in the other thread. This one looks likely to break tier Balans™. Well, new ships are always welcome.

They add variety to the game. Oh, but they are papre ships. By now we have so many paper ships in game that it doesnt really matter.

And im glad we have them, otherwise many tiers would be boring to play, with just some few options to choose from. Varety in a gme is always nice. Seen and playing the same ships all over again is boring. True, but we've never before had a line that was so much paper. The Brits have two paper battleships, Monarch and Conqueror, as Lion was actually started in metal.

The Yanks have metal all the way up to T9. The Japanese are the only nation whose Tier 10 ship is built in steel, Musashi gives us an actual fighting ship at Tier 9, and Amagi was started before the Washington Treaty upset her career & the Kanto earthquake ended it. Germany goes up to T8 in steel, with Gneisenau being what she might have been if she'd had her intended rebuild. The Soviet line is going to have, what, one BB that actually sailed and another that was cancelled on the slips, while a third is a clone of a British ship (and not the British ship that actually served under the Russian flag). The only nation with anywhere near as much BB paper in the game as Russia is France, but even there the French can boast a T8 and a T9 ship that sailed and fought their guns. I reserve judgement, and I reserve the right to enjoy these ships when they appear, but I can see why people are upset about the amount of never-built hardware in this line.

The Italians have only their government to blame for the lack of a detailed tech tree; it's not like WG hasn't tried. Meanwhile the sub reddit is crying its eyes out. Don't get me wrong, I can understand being frustrated about the Italians not having a proper line yet.but to put it bluntly, it's been incredibly obvious for a long long time that Soviet BBs would be released before Italian BBs, and many people, myself included, have been predicting that Soviet BBs would be one of the next lines released. I really don't get why people are acting all shocked and indignant about this, the writing has been on the wall for ages. I would gladly take Italian BBs instead.but the fact is they're not here yet, so I'm just going to make the best of it and enjoy the Soviet BB line. The Italians will come eventually, that much is given.